Op-Ed: The ‘Final Solution’ Comment…and the Silence That Followed

By Rep. ANITA BURROUGHS

Recently, Rep. Travis Corcoran (R-Weare) made statewide news, but not in a good way.

He posted on X: We need a final solution for theater kids in politics,” in response to an invitation to a legislative karaoke night hosted by Rep. Jessica Grill, who is Jewish.

For those unfamiliar, the phrase “final solution” was used by Nazi leaders to describe their plan to commit genocide against European Jews.

That’s not a throwaway line. It’s not edgy humor. It’s a phrase with a very specific and horrific meaning.

Speaker Sherman Packard and Minority Leader Alexis Simpson both condemned Corcoran’s statement. But beyond that, there was silence where it mattered most.

There was no public statement from Governor Ayotte or Majority Leader Jason Osborne. No call for accountability. Just silence. And that silence speaks volumes.

This stands in sharp contrast to what happened in 2020. Then-Speaker Steve Shurtleff asked Rep. Richard Komi (D-Manchester) to resign over a social media comment widely viewed as dismissive of survivors of sexual violence. Komi stepped down.

Leadership acted then. Why not now?

Deputy House Speaker Steve Smith has said that meaningful action would require a majority of lawmakers to agree it’s warranted: We can condemn it, but there is nothing we can do about it.”

I disagree.

Republican leadership has tools…if they choose to use them. They could pressure Corcoran to resign or rally their caucus to support expulsion. Leader Osborne has shown, time and again, that he can deliver votes when he wants to.

Short of that, they could at least make clear that this kind of rhetoric has consequences, including the option of supporting a serious primary challenger.

And recent elections show that even “safe” districts aren’t immune to voter backlash. Bobbi Boudman’s victory in a traditionally Republican district (Wolfeboro, Tuftonboro and Ossipee) underscores that point.

So why does this matter?

I’ll answer that personally, as a Jewish member of the New Hampshire House.

My grandfather Max came to the United States alone at age 13 from what is now Poland, fleeing the early threats that would later become the Holocaust. He spoke no English. Years later, much of his family was murdered, some at Auschwitz and Dachau.

Max was one of the kindest men I’ve ever known. We lived in the same two-family home, and I saw him every day growing up.

I never experienced antisemitism until I served in the New Hampshire State House.

Several years ago, two state representatives were brought before the Ethics Committee for posting antisemitic content. One sat across from me on the Commerce Committee. She never apologized and even suggested we should get together because we had so much in common.

No, thank you.

Neither representative faced any serious repercussion for their behavior.

Corcoran’s comment is not an isolated incident. It’s part of a broader pattern, of rhetoric and legislation that seeks to marginalize and demonize others.

And when leadership responds with silence, it sends a message.

Not just to those of us who are directly affected, but to everyone watching.

If there is no accountability from within the State House, then it must come from outside of it.

Vote out state representatives who believe they can act with impunity because they are protected by leadership or insulated by district lines.

Help your community recruit strong candidates from both sides of the aisle who reject the politics of hate and are willing to represent all their constituents, regardless of religion, race, or sexual orientation. And get out and volunteer to help get these candidates elected.  Newly elected representative Bobbi Boudman demonstrated that it can be done. 

Rep. Anita Burroughs
State Rep, Bartlett Carroll 2

NO KINGS — Not Left, Not Right, But American

One of the saddest things I saw after yesterday’s rally was how many people commented on my previous post without actually reading it. They skimmed a headline, jumped to a conclusion, and then piled on with their pre-made categories: Democrat vs. Republican, liberal vs. MAGA. That’s exactly the kind of thinking NO KINGS is here to break.

A graphic featuring a crown crossed out with red brush strokes, accompanied by the bold text 'NO KINGS' beneath. The design symbolizes opposition to monarchy and concentrated power.

NO KINGS isn’t a partisan slogan. It’s not a clever way to score points against the other team. It’s a simple, stubborn declaration: we are not a monarchy. Not now. Not ever.

What NO KINGS means

Say it plainly: the movement isn’t about which party holds power. It’s about refusing to hand our institutions and our country over to a personality or an ideology that demands unquestioning loyalty. It’s about insisting that power be accountable, that leaders be temporary servants, not permanent rulers. The Founders gave us a republic for a reason — because concentrated, unaccountable power breeds corruption, violence, and the erosion of freedom.

Don’t fall for the trap

I saw people say they’d be okay with a king — as long as that king hates the same people they hate. That’s exactly the trap. Choosing a monarch who shares your list of enemies feels satisfying in the moment, but it hands the tools of oppression to someone else. When you cheer a leader because they attack your foes, you tacitly accept that the leader will also be able to turn those tools on anyone who becomes inconvenient.

Fear is a tool

Don’t be afraid. That’s the other play in this game: scare you into submission. They want you terrified of ANTIFA, painted as the boogeyman. So let me ask plainly — who stormed the Capitol on January 6? Was it Antifa? Or was it a mob that believed it was justified by a leader’s lies?

Being anti-fascist is not a crime; it’s an ethic. If opposing authoritarianism and protecting democracy makes you “anti-fascist,” then yes — I’m proud to stand on that side. My grandfather fought fascists in World War II. He didn’t pick sides for sport; he stood against a system that crushed dissent, stamped out rights, and murdered millions. Does that make him the enemy of anyone who defends tyranny today? It shouldn’t.

A painting depicting a man standing and speaking in a public meeting, surrounded by attentive audience members, showcasing a moment of civic engagement.

What we stand for

NO KINGS is for people who believe in democratic norms: the rule of law, free and fair elections, a free press, peaceful transfer of power, and institutions that limit abuse. It’s for those who will not accept threats, intimidation, or lies as the currency of governance. It’s for those who will call out abuses whether they come from the left or the right.

If you showed up at the rally, you probably felt that: a cross-section of Americans fed up with cults of personality and unwilling to trade a fragile freedom for the illusion of tribal safety. If you read the signs and listened to the speeches, you heard families, veterans, students, and workers saying the same thing in different words: No one is above the law. No one gets to remake the country in secret or by force. No leader is owed worship.

A black flag featuring the text 'We the People' at the top, followed by the phrase 'NO KINGS IN AMERICA' in bold, colorful lettering, with stars and stripes design at the bottom, set against a green outdoor background.

Plain asks

  • Read before you shout. If you want to oppose a movement, oppose it on its terms.
  • Stop pretending democracy is mere partisanship. It’s a fragile contract we renew every day.
  • Don’t be fooled into loving a strongman because he roughs up your enemies.
  • Be unafraid to be anti-fascist. Opposing tyrannical methods is patriotism.
  • Show up, speak up, and insist on accountability from every side.

NO KINGS is a reminder and a covenant: we will not hand our republic to a crown, whether it’s literal or figurative. We will argue. We will protest. We will vote. We will hold leaders to account. Not now. Not ever. No kings.