Debt Ceiling


By Paul Krugman


As soon as Republicans took control of the House last November, it was obvious that they would try to take the economy hostage by refusing to raise the federal debt limit. After all, that’s what they did in 2011 — and hard as it may be to believe, the Tea Party Republicans were sober and sane compared to the MAGA crew. So it was also obvious that the Biden administration needed a strategy to head off the looming crisis.

More and more, however, it looks as if there never was a strategy beyond wishful thinking. I hope that I’m wrong about this — that President Joe Biden will, at the last minute, unveil an effective counter to GOP blackmail. He may even be forced to do so, as I’ll explain in a bit. But right now, I have a sick feeling about all of this. What were they thinking? How can they have been caught so off-guard by something that everyone who’s paying attention saw coming?

For those somehow new to this, the United States has a weird and dysfunctional system in which Congress enacts legislation that determines federal spending and revenue, but then, if this legislation leads to a budget deficit, must vote a second time to authorize borrowing to cover the deficit. If even one house of Congress refuses to raise the debt limit, the U.S. government will go into default, with possibly catastrophic financial and economic effects.

This weird aspect of budgeting allows a party that is sufficiently ruthless, sufficiently indifferent to the havoc it might wreak, to attempt to impose through extortion policies it would never be able to enact through the normal legislative process.

What, then, should Biden & Co. have done once Republicans took the House? They could have tried to raise the debt ceiling during the lame-duck session. This would have been hard, given an evenly divided Senate. If it was possible at all, it probably would have required making big concessions to those Democratic senators least supportive of Biden’s agenda. Still, better to have a hostage negotiation with Joe Manchin than with Marjorie Taylor Greene.

So unless there was a plan to deal with the coming confrontation, there should have been a major effort to raise the debt ceiling. The fact that there was no such effort suggested that maybe there was such a plan.

But all we’ve seen from Biden officials since the House changed hands has been a combination of assertions that a U.S. default would be catastrophic — which may well be true — and denigration of any and all possible end runs around the debt ceiling. My heart sank, for example, when Janet Yellen, the Treasury secretary, repeatedly rejected the idea of minting a platinum coin — one of several possible ways to bypass the debt limit — as a “gimmick.” Yes, it would be a gimmick, but it would also be harmless. As I explained the other day, it would not mean printing money to cover the deficit; in practice, it would amount to carrying out normal borrowing through a back door.

The problem is that Yellen was in effect saying that the administration wasn’t open to any strategies that sounded silly or unorthodox; yet every strategy that avoids the debt limit must, in fact, be unorthodox and will probably sound silly if taken out of context.

The economic merits of various unconventional financing strategies aside, think about how the White House was positioning itself politically. On one side, it signaled that it was terrified of the consequences of default; on the other, it made it clear that it was unwilling even to consider any alternatives to an increase in the debt limit. The administration might as well have put a sign on its back saying “Kick Me.”

Maybe the administration expected moderate Republicans or business groups or supposedly nonpartisan advocacy groups to somehow step in and pressure the GOP to produce a clean debt ceiling bill. But I don’t see how anyone who has been awake for the past 15 years could have believed that was a real possibility.

And sure enough, after months of asserting that it would never engage in negotiations over the debt ceiling, that it would accept nothing less than a clean increase, the administration is now … negotiating over the debt ceiling.

Many people have pointed out that this sets a terrible precedent — that having seen that extortion works, Republicans will engage in it again and again. Even these concerns, however, seem to me to be taking too long a view. Now that Republicans see what seems to be an administration on the run, there’s every reason to expect them to keep escalating their immediate demands — quite possibly to the point where no deal is possible.

There’s a precedent from the Obama years. Back in 2011, President Barack Obama and John Boehner, who was then the speaker of the House, came very close to a so-called Grand Bargain on debt that would have been objectively terrible — it would, for example, have raised the age of eligibility for Medicare, even though life expectancy for working-class Americans had risen very little — and would probably have been politically disastrous for Democrats. But the deal fell through because Republicans were unwilling to accept even small tax increases as part of a deficit-reduction plan.

Sure enough, Republicans have reportedly rejected every proposal to make a debt ceiling deal more acceptable to the Democratic base by closing tax loopholes.

I have no idea what happens next. I think there’s a real possibility that Biden officials will in the end be forced by sheer Republican intransigence to adopt unconventional methods after all — a task that will be made much harder by the fact that those same officials have spent months trash-talking the approaches they may need to follow.

But I don’t see any way to regard this whole episode as anything but a disastrous failure to face up to the reality of an opposition party controlled by extremists.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

Action Needed Strafford County, New Hampshire

This is a repost from the Dover Dems. Immediate action is needed.


Action needed this week to defeat HB 75, which will be voted on by the full NH Senate on Thursday May 11.

Email Jeb.Bradley@leg.state.nh.us ask him to work to kill HB 75 and let HB 270 go through the normal process for a bill retained in the House.

The Republicans are trying to introduce districts to be used when electing the three Strafford County commissioners. Currently the commissioners run at-large across the whole county.

HB 270 was introduced in January for this purpose, but was retained in committee on a bipartisan vote in the House Municipal and County Government Committee in February. The idea was to let the bill be discussed more fully over the summer, including asking for input from the residents of the county.

Last week the Republicans decided they did not want to discuss this with the public. Instead they amended HB 75, an unrelated bill passed by the House, to replace in its entirety the text of HB 75 with the text from HB 270. This was done in the Senate Election Law Committee with little or no warning, and they held the hearing on the amendment and the executive session to vote on the amended bill on the same day, passing it 3-2 on a party-line vote. And they added it to the Senate calendar to be quickly voted on by the full Senate the following week, on Thursday May 11.

What can you do? Email Sen. Jeb Bradley, the president of the NH Senate and ask him to work to kill HB 75. Tell him that the residents of Strafford County deserve a full opportunity to weigh in on whether districts are needed and if so, the boundaries of the districts. Tell him to allow HB 270 to go through the normal process for a bill retained in a House committee. Sen. Bradley’s email is Jeb.Bradley@leg.state.nh.us.

Our three current county commissioners, all Democrats, are leading the effort to build a new modern nursing home, refurbish the old facility to be used for transitional housing, and build a large solar farm to power it all (and more). The Republicans are desperate to stop a project that would have the government work for the common good.


sherry_frost_ commented: If government actually works to make people’s lives better, republicans lose their most powerful lie that government is, at best, useless and, at worst, evil.

Here is the e-mail I sent. Feel free to cut and paste

Mr Bradley.

 As a resident of Strafford County I have concerns over the fast tracking of legislation which would introduce districts to be used when electing the three Strafford County commissioners. 

I urge you to kill HB 75 and let HB 270 go through the normal process for a bill retained in the House.

Residents of Strafford County deserve a full opportunity to weigh in on whether districts are needed and if so, the boundaries of the districts. 

Sincerely, 

Which Political Party is Best For The Economy?

It is probably not who you think it is.

Every election has something to do with the economy. When I say economy, I mean the Main Street Economy. Not Wall Street.

The idea that the Republican Party cares about the debt and deficit is one of the biggest myths in America. The numbers speak for themselves: The last four Republican presidents have increased the deficit. The last three Democratic presidents have reduced the deficit. Historically, the United States economy has performed better on average under the administration of Democratic presidents than Republican presidents since World War II. The reasons for this are debated, and the observation applies to economic variables including job creation, GDP growth, stock market returns, personal income growth and corporate profits. The unemployment rate has fallen on average under Democratic presidents, while it has risen on average under Republican presidents.  Budget deficits relative to the size of the economy were lower on average for Democratic presidents.[ Ten of the eleven U.S. recessions between 1953 and 2020 began under Republican presidents.

Each election the republican party runs on economic issues. They try to be the party for the average family but the reality is far from that.

Donald Trump who ran for president as a fiscal genius added $6.7 trillion to the debt between fiscal year 2017 and fiscal year 2020, a 33.1% increase. In his FY 2021 budget, Trump’s budget included a $966 billion deficit. However, the national debt actually grew by $1.5 trillion between October 1, 2020, and October 1, 2021. As high as that was- we were facing a global pandemic his last year in the White House but his previous 3 years were not much better due to the republican parties irresponsible tax breaks for the top 1%. FY 2018: $1.3 trillion, FY 2019: $1.2 trillion, FY 2020: $4.2 trillion.

What Is National Debt?
The national debt, also known as federal or public debt, is the outstanding financial obligation of a country. The national debt of the United States is what the federal government owes creditors, including debt held by the public and federal government trust funds, and represents the sum of past annual budget deficits.

Tax Cuts 

Historically, tax cuts passed by Congress play a large part in the growth of the national debt. The Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 had a combined estimated 10-year cost of about $1.7 trillion. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 made the bulk of the tax cuts passed in 2001 and 2003 permanent.

In 2018, Democrats on the Senate Budget Committee estimated the annual cost of those tax cuts as $488 billion. The Tax Cuts and Job Act (TCJA) of 2017 is expected to increase budget deficits by a cumulative $1.9 trillion through 2028, according to CBO estimates.

Job creation

Job creation refers to the number of net jobs added, which is reported monthly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. For the 13 presidents beginning with Truman, total job creation was about 70.5 million for the 7 Democratic presidents and 29.1 million for the 6 Republican presidents. The Democratic presidents were in office for a total of 429 months, with 164,000 jobs per month added on average, while the Republicans were in office for 475 months, with a 61,000 jobs added per month average. This monthly average rate was 2.4 times faster under Democratic presidents.

Former President Bill Clinton said in 2012 that “Since 1961…the Republicans have held the White House for 28 years, the Democrats for 24…In those 52 years, our private economy has produced 66 million private-sector jobs. So what’s the jobs score? Republicans 24 million, Democrats 42 million.” 

Job Creation by President.

Annual percentage of change in NON FARM Employment. Change of unemployment rate during presidency

  • Ford 1.8% +2.0
  • Carter 3.06% 0
  • Reagan 2.06% -2.1
  • H.W. Bush 0.61% +1.9
  • Clinton 2.4% -3.1
  • W. Bush 0.13% +3.6
  • Obama 1.04% -3.1
  • Trump -.51% (Pandemic year) +1.6
  • Biden 4.3% -2.8

Other than during the Reagan administration in the 1980s each Republican President had poor job growth and a RISE IN UNEMPLOYMENT.

Income growth and inequality

Analysis conducted by Vanderbilt University political science professor Larry Bartels in 2004 and 2015 found income growth is faster and more equal under Democratic presidents. He found real incomes increased in the 20th and 40th percentiles of incomes under Democrats, while they fell under Republicans. Real incomes grew across all higher percentiles at a greater rate under Democrats, even when including the Great Recession and its recovery in Barack Obama’s first term. Bartels calculated in 2008 that the real value of the minimum wage in the United States over the preceding sixty years had increased 16 cents per year under Democratic presidents but declined by 6 cents per year under Republican presidents

Federal budget deficits

Blinder and Watson reported that budget deficits tended to be smaller under Democrats, at 2.1% potential GDP versus 2.8% potential GDP for Republicans, a difference of about 0.7 of a percentage point. Since 1981, federal budget deficits have increased under Republican presidents Reagan, both Bushes and Trump, while deficits have declined under Democratic presidents Clinton and Obama. The economy ran surpluses during Clinton’s last four fiscal years, the first surpluses since 1969. The deficit was projected to decline sharply in Joe Biden’s first fiscal year

Now let’s take a look at the priorities of presidents. NOT what they said they would do, but what they actually did.

The Republican Record:

In the 1980s Ronald Reagan signed massive tax cuts into law that benefit the well off and well connected. He spent our way out of the Cold War and exploded the deficit.

In 2001, 2003 George W. Bush signed Ito law massive tax cuts benefiting the wealthiest Americans. He got us into 2 failed wars that cost BILLIONS each year, necessity of which can be debated. It is that kind of spending which hurts the economy. The combined cost of his tax cuts alone is estimated at $1.7 TRILLION. But as the Republicans gave away billions on wars and in corporate welfare they ask the poorest Americans to toughen up.

In 2017 “businessman” Donald Trump gives another round of massive tax cuts to the top 1% further driving up the debt. Giving 83% of tax cuts to the top 1% while the rest of us are asked to work harder. The tax cut and jobs act is expected to increase the debt by a cumulative total of $1.9 TRILLION by 2028. Instead of any social safety nets the bottom 15% of Americans are told to pull them selves up by their boot straps.

The House of Representatives barely passed a Debt Ceiling Proposal. Knowing that it will NEVER pass the senate. The debt ceiling could be hit as soon as June. ANY default on the U.S. national debt during the current interest rate environment could escalate into a wave of corporate and sovereign defaults.

McCarthy and the GOP House are trying to hold the economy of the WORLD hostage. Even though former President Donald Trump extolled the debt ceiling as “a sacred element of our country that should never be wielded as a bargaining chip in budget talks “.

It is not worth going into the House Proposal because it is just a recycled version of every other GOP budget proposal. Keep giving the money to the Wall Street / corporate community while Main Street suffers.

HOW DARE THE GOP LECTURE THE REST OF US ON FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY. The record is clear. If you care about the economy you know who to vote for.